By: Ehizokale Ogette
Peter Obi’s assertion that the 2024 Edo State gubernatorial election was undemocratic and that “everybody knows who won” is both misleading and detrimental to Nigeria’s democratic development. Such statements, especially from a national figure, risk eroding public trust in electoral institutions and processes.
The Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC), Nigeria’s constitutionally mandated electoral body, declared Senator Monday Okpebholo of the All Progressives Congress (APC) as the winner, securing 291,667 votes against the People’s Democratic Party (PDP) candidate Asue Ighodalo’s 247,274 votes. While concerns about electoral malpractices, including vote buying and result manipulation, were raised by observers and stakeholders, it’s imperative to address these issues through established legal channels rather than public conjecture.
Obi’s characterization of the election as “state capture” , without presenting concrete evidence through appropriate legal avenues, undermines the rule of law. In a democracy, grievances regarding electoral processes should be pursued through petitions and judicial review, ensuring that allegations are substantiated and adjudicated fairly.
Moreover, such sweeping statements can inflame tensions and polarize the electorate. It’s essential for leaders to promote unity and confidence in democratic institutions. While it’s crucial to hold electoral bodies accountable, it’s equally important to approach criticisms constructively and within the bounds of the law.
In conclusion, while the 2024 Edo gubernatorial election faced challenges, dismissing the entire process as undemocratic without due legal process is counterproductive. Constructive engagement, evidence-based critiques, and adherence to legal procedures are vital for strengthening Nigeria’s democracy and ensuring that electoral reforms are both effective and credible.
